• Importance of Absolute Freedom By Man – From Free Will Gift By Our Creator

    Freedom – true, absolute freedom of mankind – is one of the most critical aspects that *must* be followed by any government we live under from a purely religious point of view. Why is that…?

     

    Our Creator endowed us with an absolute free will. That Creator of ours hardly had to do so, but rather did so in gifting us with a most blessed concept and a commandment for how mankind must live: Free, in every conceivable way imaginable. Therefore, we who live in democratic societies must NEVER vote for authoritarian or some such governments or politicians. Remember, Hitler was elected to office by the German Republic – he did not suddenly seize power by a coup de tat.

     

    And so we must remain ever mindful to never give up the freedoms we have earned and have commanded by our Creator. Frankly, it scares me when a democratically elected leader says things like they wish his people acted like the North Koreans in worshipping that leader, or else they should have a lifetime appointment to office, as recently happened in China. This is definitively not to get political here – it is a simple reaction to unthinkable words to anyone who believes our own Creator gifted and desired immutable free will to all. When a leader says they are having a deep love affair with a North Korean leader who had his own uncle – and so many others in a purge that would fit right in with the Purge films and TV series – killed in unthinkable, horrific ways: The uncle’s nephew, O Sang-Hon was burnt alive by a flame thrower; the uncle and another official? Death by anti-aircraft machine guns, before being burnt to a crisp by… you guessed it! Flamethrowers.

     

    We must forever keep our most basic rights to absolute freedom, and condemn and refute or resist any and all who would take that away from us in any conceivable way. For, again, it is what our Divine Creator almost demanded of us by gifting us with absolute free will. This means that, as adults, we should be able to engage in any way so long as no others are truly negatively effected by said action. We simply must forever retain that freedom, one we still haven’t reached as of yet – many actions are considered illegal and banned that should not be.

     

    Whether this means gay marriage, women’s rights, minority rights or whatever. Even the so-called “War on Drugs!!!!!”, in going after primarily marijuana, a substance that hardly has any worse repercussions than alcohol, denies us that freedom to make that choice for ourselves. I also firmly believe we have a right to make decisions which might eventually harm ourselves – like smoking or other such things. As long as no one else faces harm from it, that choice is our divinely gifted right to make for ourselves as sentient adult beings.

     

    Now as to why this absolute freedom is so important from my own perspective of the Creator Creating by way of Simulated Reality…? Well then, look no further than my previous posts on our existential purpose and the reason we were so Created: To have our Creator “cultivate” as many DIFFERENT sentient conscious beings as was possible. A distinct removal or lack of those freedoms as human beings…? It also takes away our right to be so very different! Think on the worst authoritarian states of human civilization: They one and all sought to find a human population that was little more than brainwashed robots who were one and all the same.

     

    This stands in absolute opposition to our Creators intentions and desires for us as human beings. Therefore, any such authoritarian or limitation on our freedoms is almost standing as an enemy to the ways of our Creator and that Creator’s intentions and desires for us to enjoy. A positive side effect of this was surely creating as many distinct human consciousnesses as proved possible, in creating a veritable rainbow of human sentient individuals to enjoy our afterlives in our Creator’s higher plane of existence alongside the rest of mankind that have passed from this Earth in something much like a garden of unique and exceptional intelligent conscious beings.

     

    So we must therefore always resist any and all efforts or laws aimed at taking away any such freedoms – and equally so, promote and ensure passage of such laws to ensure freedoms exist for us. Should one live in a distinctly authoritarian state today…? Then one must always seek to resist in any way possible – because God commanded it be so – in seeking to restore a government of absolute freedom for one’s citizens.

     

    You simply cannot have truly different and distinct sentient consciousness develop under such authoritarian governments. They seek to cling to their power by developing a populace of identical sameness, brainwashed into “behaving” and worshipping that government and its “Dear Leadership”. This is utterly wrong and downright offensive to our Creator’s intentions for us to ALL enjoy.

     

    The “utopia” on this Earth of ours comes from a civilization based on absolute freedoms for all the many billions of us. We must seek this out and ensure it to be just so. Again, anything else goes directly against our Creator’s designs and desires for us to have at this point in our civilization. We must all seek to become ourselves: who we are meant to be. This means following whatever path, no matter how strange or outlandish it might seem, so long as no others are harmed in so doing.

     

    So just remember: Our freedoms are a divine commandment by our Creator, one we must all seek for ourselves and all others who share this Creation with us. It ensures our afterlife will be as truly spectacular as possible, populated not with sheep of absolute sameness, but rather as distinctly different and “themselves” as proves possible. Our freedom is something we must fight for, no matter what. If not for ourselves, for our children and all those that inherit this Earth from us. They must know absolute and complete freedom for themselves, just as we should know it today for ourselves.

     

     

  • (Minor) Evidence Towards a Simulated Existence: Jewish and Gregorian Calendars Recurrence Cycle

    In celebration of the Jewish holidays we’re just now in the midst of, I came across a most interesting and peculiar curiosity in the midst of recently doing some quality reading & learning: Something of a truly astounding coincidence, if coincidence is indeed all we choose to label it as! (Clearly, I see something else just here; a something special that’s, just perhaps!- a bit more than any mere coincidence in all of this.) The topic area for my latest bizarre quirk? It was regarding the Hebrew Calendar, as I sought to read up on exactly how that process works and the repetition or cycles found with their calendar.

    Personally, I always find it most incredible indeed to take a step back and think on the matter from a more rationalized perspective, but even then shall we discover many different pitfalls into sheer and utter madness itself! If and view such things in a light like, “Roshashana fell on a Tuesday that was on October 2nd… now then, when will the next time come around where the three come into alignment, – and just how very old will I myself be?!” Well, more often than not…? The end result is me cursing myself for my inquisitiveness as the revelation of an answer makes me feel older than dirt just now: “I’ll be 89!?!?” I think to myself in a blind panic. I surely think to myself then and there. It quite makes for a humbling little experience, to say the very absolute least about it!

    The article that first exposed me to this bizarre quirk can be found here: https://en.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Mathematics_of_the_Jewish_Calendar/The_recurrence_period_of_the_calendar And, more specifically still, when it comes to what I’ll be discussing at the end hereabouts/the point of this entire post, the very final section found at the preceding link is what you need to keep an eye out for. However, rather than make you read through all of that, all on your very own (just as I myself did!), let me attempt to instead summarize everything for you here and now!

    The Jewish Calendar is actually a most fascinating thing upon close examination (i.e.: a four hour Wikipedia binge, but of course!) of all of it. The means it follows in order to decide what dates fall when is based off of the lunisolar calendar, in which such things are derived from the cycle of the Moon and the Sun. Furthermore, it utilizes the 19 year Metonic Cycle to bring it into alignment with solar years, as lunar years are typically 11 days shorter than solar ones. This requires the addition of an extra month every two to three years, marking 7 years with a leap month in every 19 year Metonic Cycle.

    Ah, but things are not merely so simple as all of that! This 19 year process of adding in leap months is *still* not enough to fix the discrepancy between the lunar and solar calendar! (And, if you’re anything like me, at this point you’re starting to become *really* glad we use something so “simple” as the Gregorian calendar! It seems much more straightforward to “fix” and keep in solar alignment, something we only take cycles of 400 years in order to accomplish as such.) For indeed, after 19 years of trying to fix things, we still find ourselves off by 6 minutes and 40 seconds with the tropical year.

    Therefore, every 216 years, the Hebrew calendar will find itself still falling one day behind the average tropical year, just as it takes 231 years for it to fall one day behind the Gregorian year. All these games of trying to fix things and retain alignment with such systems means the recurrence rate for when certain dates fall from year to year and repeat themselves exactly is exceptionally large.

    By and large, the Hebrew calendar repeats itself on a cycle of 247 years. However, those 247 years still find it being off by about 50 minutes on average. So, in order for the Hebrew calendar to repeat itself *exactly*, we find that the true, exact cycle is on the order of 689,472 years!!!

    Now here’s where it gets interesting. Recall I mentioned the Gregorian calendar you most likely use yourself recycles itself every 400 years? Well then, for the Gregorian *and* the Hebrew calendar to come into alignment with each other when accounting for these various cycles, we find it necessary to multiply the 20,871 weeks that are in 400 Gregorian years by all those incredible (and downright inconceivable!) 689,472 years!

    And so it is here that we find the odd little curiosity in this, and the reason for my writing this here little posting of mine. If you should want to do that – to discover how many years the cycle is for the Gregorian and Hebrew calendars to both come into alignment with one another and repeat themselves absolutely exactly, we indeed multiply 20,871 by 689,472.

    Should one care to do so…? (Well, I’ll do it for you here!) The answer comes out to be a mind boggling 14,389,970,112 Hebrew years, and 14,390,140,400 Gregorian ones!

    Now then, and now that we have everything down, why is it I even bothered writing all of this to begin with…? What meaning have those 14,390,140,400 years that would create such a spark in my noggin? Well, 14.3 billion years (with a B!) is pretty darn close to the currently accepted age of our universe as we now know the Big Bang model to indicate!

    So it was that I found it most peculiar: Firstly, that it takes such a downright impossible number of years in order for the Gregorian and Hebrew calendars to come into absolutely perfect alignment with one another, and repeat themselves in order to begin the process all anew! Then, and clearly more importantly still, the truly impossible odds that, when we are looking at some number so eye-poppingly huge, the odds that it would come out to being so utterly close to the accepted true age of our universe. That number for the two calendars could have just as easily been 7 billion… or 143 billion! But no, we rather discover a most bizarre little coincidence here instead.

    When looking at the two most commonly used calendars in Western society/theological history, and their meeting up and aligning perfectly with one another, it comes out to a cycle that is nearly identical to the current age of our universe!

    Now then, is there any true meaning to be derived from this or something truly exceptional to be uncovered…? Certainly not – it simply stands as a most bizarre quirk in considering the odds of that number coming down to nearly the current age of the universe itself; that the Gregorian and Hebrew calendars only come into alignment with each other and repeat themselves identically on a cycle that’s the present approximate age of this marvelous universe of ours. Such that we are only just now starting to reach such a point as to when the two calendars have completed a single cycle and repeat themselves match for match – assuming, but of course, that we’d started counting during the moment of the Big Bang itself.

    It is coming across strange and bizarre stuff such as exactly this in overwhelming abundance that led me to the consideration that it perhaps wasn’t all merely astoundingly random, utterly unbelievable coincidences whose odds of occurring just precisely so staggered the imagination, but rather -just perhaps!- spoke to something else entirely different still.

    And so I’ll leave it up to you to decide here, on this: Is it all just a totally random coincidence that the Jewish and Christian calendars, based as they are off the solar and lunisolar cycles and where the Earth happens to be in this solar system, have themselves a cycle of alignment that corresponds pretty darn closely to the age of the entire universe itself? Or is this another tiny little quirk that speaks to the notion of a simulated reality where those tiny – but nearly impossible in their inconceivability – little quirks instead come as a consequence of such simulated notions? Where you find bizarre coincidences with unexpected, inconceivable connections due to the sort of “glitches” or consequence of simulating just so?

    Clearly, I myself take the latter notion as what and how I choose to see: That, taken alone, they might surely seem to mean very little. But, altogether, once they start adding and stacking up by the bundle full, you might just yourself start to see them in something of a very different light entirely! And it is like here, the subject matter behind and surrounding this is hardly some second thought. Instead, between Hebrew/Christian Gregorian calendars, lunisolar cycles based on the Sun and Moon, and all the many numbers and calculations involved…?

    Well then, we find that this “coincidence” involves both the theological/religious, and then the scientific and mathematical, all coming together in a neat little bundle in order to yield a most strange and unusual oddity as I’ve just described above. As the entire purpose of this body of work involves taking the understandings of religion and science together as one, I myself found this particular little quirk especially meaningful in just such a regard!

     

    To read further still on this subject, I’ll direct you to someone else who had previously come across this coincidence all on their own and wrote it up from a mathematical perspective: https://mathpolymath.wordpress.com/2013/11/27/calendar-coincidences-part-ii/

  • Importance of Cosmological Coincidences: Sun/Moon Same Apparent Size

    To go hat in hand with my most recent writing regarding the extreme coincidence between the time it takes the Hebrew and Gregorian Calendars to 100% sync up again and the known age of our Universe, itself…? May I then present you with yet another extreme, nearly impossible sort of coincidence: The fact the glowing globes of the Sun and the Moon both appear to be identical in size when viewed from the Earth, despite the fact that they are so very different (One might almost say the difference in size is night and day!), indeed! This, never mind the understanding that, in order for that coincidence to exist just so, it requires several different unrelated and improbable variables just to take place as it does here.

     

    Before we dive into the why, how and whatnot of that, however, I’d like to emphasize just why these bizarre coincidences are so notable and the causation behind my citing them in relation to the simulation hypothesis. Believe me, this isn’t done in a manner seeking to come off as much like some wild conspiracy theorist, picking and choosing whatever facts so stand out as to embolden one’s own argument – even if those facts have no relationship whatsoever to the argument one seeks to make.

     

    Of course we should highlight the fact that, for every impossible coincidence, there are an infinite number of other possible coincidences which don’t exist. In other words, much like selective memory, we are indeed selecting true standouts because they stand out so. Likewise, they are, on average, few and far between.

     

    But this does not dim or lessen their impact here, or their importance to the argument for a simulated reality. Because, like all those many “coulda been coincidences that weren’t, and never will be”…? These same coincidences should far more easily not exist than they should exist as we know them to. Therefore, that simple fact that they do exist is indeed most notable and striking… and an important factor in better focusing on the question of a simulated reality for us here and now. Because… all in all, if one were of a betting sort, the odds say rather definitively that they should not exist as a coincidence. Period.

     

    Now then, since this is our second recent “bizarre coincidence” piece of writing, it also seems important to set up some guidelines here as to what better informs on the simulation hypothesis versus what does not. Now, for our purposes here…? First and foremost, they should be things that are otherwise so utterly impossible to conceive the probability of existing just so as to truly leave an impression upon discovery that there’s no real rhyme nor reason for them to exist as they do.

     

    Just as importantly as that, however, if not even more so…? These should -must- involve matters more cosmic than anything else. It really cannot involve anything that humanity has any part in controlling or creating. The whole calendar alignment discussion, although calendars were indeed dreamt up/controlled by mankind…? It also draws from Earth’s orbit, the age of the universe, etc. Furthermore, no one with a hand in formulating those calendars had any inkling or notion of all the variables at play – much less any concern for or idea as to when two separate calendars would sync up because of their assorted idiosyncrasies and Earth’s orbit around the Sun.

     

    This next example is even more cosmic than that, however, because it involves matters of our very reality itself on a celestial scale and concerning factors that, one must realize, any Creator of ours had a hand in yielding as that same Creator gave our world its own existence. These, being things that are genuinely on the cosmic level of existence – whether in being astronomical or on a fundamental existential scale. Physics, chemistry, astronomy… what all have you.

     

    Why is this informative vis-a-vis the simulation hypothesis particularly, you might next inquire? The simple reason is that their existence, being exponentially more improbable than not, can be seen as something of a “sign” that all of this is far from random. Now, there are two ways we can look at it from the simulated standpoint: These are much like proverbial “bugs” as our reality was Created and made to exist, giving an indication (sort of like the great difficulty for our own technology to create truly random number generators at the present time) that ours is not a genuinely random, chaotic sort of existence, but rather exposing the more intentional & deliberate nature behind our universe as certain side effects associated with that intentional Creation of ours.

     

    The second potential way of looking at these matters…? They are wholly intentional in existing as they do! These are things that were imparted as they were -the impossible being made possible- such that we might indeed one day turn to and look at them as evidence for our Creator in just such a light. That, without forcefully exposing Itself anew just so, nor by dramatically interfering in our own contemporary existence, we find things that allow us to better make up our own minds and determinations on our literal being.

     

    As for me, myself…? Well, I’d like to think it’s a little bit of both, really: That they might be originally unintended side effects of a more simulated form of reality. But that, rather than being “removed” or altered in any such a way, they were rather “kept as they are” because they could play a positive role in guiding us closer to our Creator and nature of existence itself.

     

    So that’s all the errata as to the why behind these particular writings of mine. Now then, as to the “what” we’re looking at this time around? Well, as I already said to start off with, today we are to look at the impossible coincidence that our Sun and our Moon both look identical in size from our Earth… despite being anything but! Greater still, however, is the fact that there is no rhyme nor reason for this happening as it does; there are plenty of cases with eerie astronomical standouts/oddities that really involve orbital resonances or the like – where the impossible is actually explained away as some basic consequence of nature and physics.

     

    This, however, is not the case here. Understand this much, if anything at all: There is absolutely no reason why the Moon should be the size it is, yet at the distance it is from the Earth, and those same factors applied to the Sun and the Earth. In this particular instance here? It is entirely just a random, “impossible” coincidence without one single factor of physical laws that worked in the interests of creating such a coincidence. Zero.

     

    Equally so, the fact this impossible coincidence involving a satellite world and a star take place on the one known world with intelligent consciousness living upon it. We didn’t have to go out to Saturn to say, “Hey! That’s a bizarre coincidence there with Titan and the Sun! It shouldn’t exist… but it does!” Rather, it is strictly limited to right here on this very world – indeed, no other such planetary body in the solar system enjoys such a coincidence as this, something which makes that coincidence all the more notable.

     

    Furthermore still, that we have only one single satellite. Obviously, the odds would be exponentially increased were we instead like Jupiter or Saturn in possessing a countless many more satellite worlds trapped in our own planet’s orbit; where you’ve got, say, ten moons encircling your world, and one of them has a size relative to its distance that just so happens to result in it appearing the same size in the sky as the far more massive Sun that birthed our whole entire existence.

     

    I should hope it to be rather obvious to you just now, but when you’re looking at only one such moon, the odds of all these factors existing as they do just so (and on the one world with life upon it to take notice of such a thing, no less!) skyrockets to truly astronomically absurd levels, indeed!

     

    Consider the implications of this coincidence; much the same as how we happen to know it to be 100% true: In a total Solar Eclipse, the two come together in lining up… and just so happen to make for an absolutely perfect match! Were any of the many variables involved any different, the Sun would not have that perfect “blotting out” by the Moon, but rather the Sun would be greatly engulfed by or have the Moon appear as a tiny little dot traversing across its own giant face in our sky.

     

    So this special coincidence has resulted in something that has astounded and created ripples across all of human history, as our ancestors looked to the sky during a majestic total eclipse of the Sun; creating, just as it did, many important ramifications for ancient cultures, mythologies, societies and historical developments happening as they did whereby mankind sought to explain, understand, or receive “divine messages”/took various actions based on these beautiful rare events.

     

    But the importance found in their being identical in size is hardly limited only to the exceptionally rare events of total solar eclipses! For, once upon a time, before street lamps and the like came to be, that Moon of ours served as the sole nighttime light source for our long ago ancestors: A very real, quite literal “nighttime Sun”, indeed!

     

    As a result of that aspect here, consider the… almost “comfort”, I suppose, of ancient and primitive peoples having their two different cosmic light sources being of the same size. In our modern electrical age it can be all too easy to forget, but that beautiful full Moon was once the very literal nighttime Sun. One can thusly imagine it being far easier for such nomadic and tribal populations to gaze upwards and see that both their daytime and nighttime suns were glowing globes of light utterly identical in size at their peak. All the same, we can all too easily envision that the fact they were identical drove many over the millennia to an understanding of God Creating our world; that the balance and harmony showed just exactly what I proposed earlier: Evidence of a decidedly non-chaotic, hardly randomized sort of existence, but instead yielding signs of an immaculate design, order and structure to Creation itself.

     

    Now, if you shouldn’t be all that well versed in astronomy and the like, you might still be wondering why these two disparate bodies do indeed appear to be the same size from our own meager Earthly vantage point. In this, unlike most all else we might talk about on these pages, it is actually quite exceedingly simple: The Moon just so happens to be approximately 400 times smaller than the Sun, yet the Sun is roughly 400 times further away from the Earth than the Moon is.

     

    And that, right there, is it. The Moon also just so happens to be exactly where it is in relation to the Earth – as close as it is, even a small variation in its own distance from the Earth would immediately and irrevocably shatter this particular coincidence of illusion. Instead, the Moon would either appear much larger or vastly smaller than the Sun by just a tiny fractional adjustment in its distance from the Earth.

     

    But none of that is the case, and so is it rendered a moot point. Furthermore, that this particular alignment happens as it does in the here and now: The Sun changes its size in our sky over its existence – it’ll blossom and grow bigger and bigger as it runs out of hydrogen fuel for its nuclear fusion furnace. The Moon’s orbit is likewise pulled closer and closer to Earth over time by our world’s drawing force of gravity. Now yes, this particular resonance in apparent size will last a mighty long time, indeed – dinosaurs themselves might have glanced up and seen something quite similar during an eclipse – and yet, it does not refute the fact that it’s very much also taking place now, as humanity dawns, and all of it on the very same world that same humanity dawned on.

     

    In the first paragraph, I mentioned the multitude of variables that play into creating this particular coincidence of ours. Allow me to list them out for you such that you might get a better inkling of just how exceptional of a coincidence this one right here truly is:

     

    • Those include the fact we have a natural satellite, and only a single one moon at that
    • The size it just so happened to become upon forming as it did.
    • Where it ended up around the Earth.
    • The size of our own Sun.
    • Where the Earth ended up sitting around that same Sun.
    • The where we ourselves just so happen to be, upon that very same Earth (and not, say, dwelling upon the Moon or on Mars).
    • And finally, the when: Meaning right now, as all those variables line up in order to impart these two celestial bodies as appearing the same size from our world’s surface, when this won’t always be (and hasn’t always been) the case!

    I might also add this aspect to be taken into consideration just now: The fact this same coincidence doesn’t exist anywhere else in the Solar System, despite numerous planets and hundreds of natural satellites, but rather on a world with only a single natural satellite that also houses one special little species of lifeform upon its surface.

     

    Whew! Well, those are surely a lot of factors that all come into resonance with one another, in order to definitively yield a truly improbable impossibility being made into a striking reality for us all!

     

    Ultimately, I would therefore like to espouse the belief that this impossible coincidence that shouldn’t have been is as it most certainly is for a very good reason: It serves as yet another example of how ours is hardly some random, chaotic sort of existence. Rather, it shows a very deliberate and intentional work of design behind it all. It works to better illuminate and add credence to the supposition that ours is indeed a simulated reality – for indeed, one would likely expect such freak occurrences and statistical impossibilities made possible as the result more of something similar to our own more… “automated” technological processes. Where statistical, mathematical improbabilities exist more so than ones more “basic” and deliberate.

     

    For that is exactly what this right here happens to be: A purely mathematical impossibility whereupon the Moon stands 400 times smaller but 400 times closer to the Earth than does the Sun. As such, I cannot imagine I am alone upon making this realization that it would sure seem to be possible that it’s a consequence of ours being a simulated reality, made as it was by our Creator. In the end, it stands as just yet another small straw serving as evidence towards that Simulated notion… amidst an ever increasing bundle of them, one that inevitably builds enough to “break the camel’s back,” as it were, to result in more firmly accepting such simulated ideas as being a simulated /reality/ for us all.

     

    In closing, should you like to read more about this topic… or don’t fully take my word for it that there is no reason that these variables exist just exactly as they do; absent any scientific explanation that would explain away nor improve the odds for this happening precisely as it does…? May I then offer up the following links to articles discussing this very same topic, albeit from a decidedly non-simulated hypothesis sort of lens:

     

    Of particular significance, we find the forthcoming quote that comes from this link:

     

    Coincidence that sun and moon seem same size?

     

    “EarthSky asked Myles Standish about the similarity in the size of Earth’s moon and sun, as seen from Earth. He is a mathematical astronomer and a former professor at Yale University. He worked for CalTech’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. He has published over 300 articles, mostly in the field of solar system dynamics and celestial mechanics. He said this similarity is unique among the planets and moons that make up our local family in space, our solar system. In other words, it doesn’t occur with any other planets and moons in our immediate neighborhood of space.”

     

    http://www.astronomy.com/magazine/ask-astro/2000/10/why-is-the-moon-exactly-the-same-apparent-size-from-earth-as-the-sun-surely-this-cannot-be-just-coincidence-the-odds-against-such-a-perfect-match-are-enormous

     

    https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/24912/can-the-apparent-equal-size-of-sun-and-moon-be-explained-or-is-this-a-coincidenc

     

    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/life-unbounded/the-solar-eclipse-coincidence/

     

  • Our Reality Existing Inside Of Our Creators Versus Separated Realities

    Another concept which rather well applies to the idea of a simulated reality is the notion of reality itself, both of our Creator’s own/our ultimate afterlife: Heaven, and then our reality that we presently exist in.

    Now then, in the more traditional sense, the notion of Heaven and where our Creator also exists, is most often seen as being somehow separate from our own “level of reality”. In this way, we do not, in other words, exist inside of this higher level of reality, whereby our reality itself is actually somehow inside of Heaven. Stop and consider how the traditional sense of Heaven exists alongside our reality. We simply are not a part of our Creator’s reality in this traditional understanding, not until our souls ascend to our afterlife by moving onward. Current religious thought just finds that where we exist just now is quite simply separate from Heaven, and not “part of it” whereby it exists within/underneath this higher plane of existence. Thusly, this creates quite a problem that sees our reality as being separate from God’s own.

    But when you look at such notions from the perspective of the simulation hypothesis, it is there where we can find that we actually exist inside of our Creator’s reality. In other words…? In that more traditional understanding, the question of where our reality exists and where our Creator’s reality alongside our own afterlife exists? It is essentially an open question, but one where there really isn’t any room to associate our reality as being a part of our Creators, as in it exists within it, being a lower tiered reality that is a part of (inside & below) that Creator’s plane of existence.

    Yet it is with the simulation hypothesis wherein we gain an answer as to where our reality exists vis-a-vis our Creators: Our reality is “inside” of that Creator’s reality – not necessitating the literal creation of an entirely separate reality, one that’s outside of that reality. Because that traditional understanding creates a problem in this way: If our own reality is separate from our Creators, and not a part of it, then our reality can be seen as being equal to that Creators plane of existence. Much like how the idea of a multiverse works, you’d have an infinite number of spheres of existence. Here a bubble, there a bubble: Each one essentially being equal to one another, each containing its own reality/universe.

    This *really* doesn’t work with the understanding of our reality up against our Creator’s reality/our own Heaven or afterlife. We have always understood that our reality is a lower tiered plane of existence up against God’s own reality. So you have two ways of understanding this: Our reality is either separated from Heaven, existing alongside of it, or else, with the simulation hypothesis, we can exist inside of and underneath God’s own reality/heaven – a part of a lower tiered universe.

    Most traditional senses of religious thought definitively do not find that we exist “inside” or underneath God’s higher plane of existence. We are simply separate from that reality. There’s just no room in such thought to find that our own reality exists as a part of Heaven itself; instead finding that our reality is separate from God’s own, wherein it can be seen as being almost equal to that reality as a consequence of its being separated from God’s higher tiered plane of existence.

    It’s largely with the simulation hypothesis that we can grasp a more rational understanding: That our reality literally exists inside of/underneath/below our Creator’s own. There we can begin to conceive how that reality of ours is so connected to our Makers; how we can “move on” and ascend to an afterlife, simply moving on up to that higher plane of existence where ours exists inside of our Creators reality. In this way, our reality is never equal to our Makers in just such a way, but rather it always exists below and almost subservient to that higher plane of existence.

    With the philosophy of the simulation hypothesis (one quite different from my own ideas, where the simulations are always just created by human civilizations… on and on and on), there has been the thought of the problem of having a never ending chain of simulated realities: Each new reality constantly progressing along to an equal point in time where they create simulations just the same as their own was so done. Yet this simply cannot be: If a simulated reality exists on some form of technological creation inside of one reality, that “hardware” or whatever the case may be cannot be capable of handling a never ending chain of equal simulations. In other words, with the idea of the simulated reality, that reality of ours is automatically less capable than the reality of our Creator.

    So we come around to the idea that fits with our traditional understanding: The reality we exist in during our formative time is not equal to our Creators. It simply can never be equal to that higher plane of existence. We exist inside of, below, and underneath our Creator’s reality. The more traditional sense, however, sees our reality as being somehow separated from our Creators. With that notion in mind, we just don’t find that our reality exists inside of heaven itself. It is instead separate from God’s plane of existence, Created in some way as to exist outside of “God’s Kingdom”.

    So it is that the idea of a simulated reality coexists with our Creator’s reality: Made in such a way as to exist inside of our Maker’s own reality, and so it is never equal to that higher plane of existence, but rather is always limited by the capabilities of our Creator’s own higher tier of reality.

    This also allows us to conceive of only but a singular reality: There isn’t God’s reality, then our own -dwelling somewhere outside of God’s plane of existence-, and perhaps a Hell to boot. With the simulation hypothesis, we can rather see that there is only one reality, and then ours exists inside of that one bit of Creation.

  • Humanity to God – The Child to the Parent: Human Civilization as a Maturing Entity

    We’re now beginning to get much deeper into things, as this post contains one of what I feel is the most central ideas to this entire body of work: Perceiving the all of human civilization much the same as any other singular maturing entity. Meaning…? It progressively grows and advances, maturing all the while, in being able to stand as something fundamentally changed from what it once was.

    An idea of a linearly+progressively evolving -maturing- human civilization should not be seen as some excuse or desperate bid to explain away or dismiss certain aspects of older religious teachings. Rather, it is evidenced in every single other aspect of Creation itself: Human beings… or, for that matter, all known life. Stars and planets, alike. The whole universe!

    For all things in our humble little slice of reality, there is both a time to be born and a time to die. In between those two, absolutely nothing exists in some static state, wholly unchanging all the while. To expect that Creator would imbue human civilization with such an impossible trait found nowhere else seems most irrational, just on its face.

  • Where’s God Today? Addressing Why Divinity Would Not Interfere in More Recent Human Development

    Next up on our agenda? One might begin to wonder, “Why doesn’t God step in and make His wishes known to us directly, just as He once did so long ago?” In my eyes, this is an utter absurdity for anyone to realistically expect – it would completely, irrevocably disrupt our entire existence. It would also be exactly the same as a parent stepping in to “reparent” their 50-year old adult child… no less, with that parent’s refusing to step back, let go and allow their offspring to ‘sink or swim’ doubtlessly being responsible for whatever his or her present predicaments may be; those problems which require such reparenting, even at the half century mark! What’s more, God simply doesn’t need to do any such thing! – most certainly not when He can influence and direct the very same desired outcomes, only doing so from “behind the scenes,” as it were.

    There appears to be a good many here in our world today who seem to expect that, in their mind, God’s existence is somehow disproven by the lack of any (relatively recent) direct interactions with us or our forebears. All the more, many a conartist or cultist in such modern times have outright declared that, if they themselves aren’t God and/or Jesus Christ reborn, then God at the very least directly communicates to them – and to them alone! Both of these views -that God must either prove His divine existence to us by way of direct interaction, or that God really is somehow speaking to only one out of seven billion worth- are utterly incorrect, in my estimation… most especially not when God -that higher power/force- doesn’t need to do anything of the sort!

  • The Technological God: Examining The Divine Creator Without Resorting to Literal “Magic”

    In addition to the notion of human civilization as a maturing, advancing entity (the closest thing to an actual child in relation to that divine Creator), another important idea forming the basis of these existential ideas hinges upon the thought that, “any technology sufficiently far advanced enough will appear indistinguishable from magic” in the eyes of those unfamiliar with such innovations and advancements.

    It is a simple notion, just the same as it’s an exceptionally accurate one. Invent a time machine, take your smartphone back only four hundred years, and you’ve got yourself a death sentence for witchery. That’s just four centuries removed from the here and now! Go back a thousand, and cure someone’s pneumonia with a pill? “Burn the witch! What magic is this, vanishing the affliction of the cursed airs?!”

    What meaning does this odd idea of “advanced ideas that are indistinguishable from magic” truly have to us in relation to the divine Creator of us all? How can coming from such a perspective be anything other than unrepentant and heretical blasphemying? In my eyes, I suppose it’s all rather straightforward enough:

  • What Meaning Has Magic, Anyways? (The Technological God, Part II)

    While I’ve gone on about “advanced technologies or ideas being indistinguishable from magic”…? Any such magic, put in “realistic” terms, simply means various processes or concepts that are yet to be properly understood. In that same sense, seeing our reality as having been Created through something besides sheer magic is neither to lessen or denigrate the nature of our divine Creator – rather, it is only to apply new understandings and knowledge of ours in various ways relating to the nature of our own existence. As a result, it denotes only how we have continued to come further along over time and kept making incredible new discoveries all the while – nothing more than that, and nothing less.

    Therefore, there truly, genuinely is no real magic – only a lack of knowledge or comprehension. A magnet offers levitation and defiance of gravity – surely, as much of a magical skill as anything imaginable! We are quite simply imperfect beings living in an impossible world, who are of the sort always desperate to ascribe meaning or understanding to all things: Known or unknown, alike! A consequence of this fantastic inquisitiveness of ours is that, should we come across something that appears to defy our understanding, we must also place it in some form of context or reason – most often resorting to such ideas of outright magic and incomprehension.

  • Creators Reflected In Their Creations: Drawing Insight Into Divine Matters Through Knowing Of Our Own World

    Next up comes one of the final pieces of the puzzle as forms the foundation for this here work: The belief that there’s absolutely no sentient being (whether that should involve one divine or otherwise) that makes any Creation completely and entirely dissimilar to anything (and everything) it knows for itself. In other words: Every single Created work is a reflection of its Creator – first, foremost and forevermore.

    What’s the meaning I intend to come from this particular notion? Well, much as I’ve detailed previously on these pages, our whole reality has no actual, literal magic anywhere to be found in it (as in that of the “Abracadabra” variety). As a result of this most notable aspect to our existence, so too should we neither expect nor hold that divine Creator to be anything based in some literal form of pure magic. Even so, oddly enough that’s exactly what our current understanding of the divine is centered around in its entirety – how it’s a supreme being existing both in and as sheer magics.

  • Preface to A Simulated Existence

    Prior to delving into a more in depth examination of a simulated sort of existence, I’d first like to start out by merely dipping our toes into the murky waters with something of a prologue.

    Part of what led me to all of these (admittedly quite strange!) notions was the fact that I’ve long felt as though the countless many immense transformations our world has undergone in recent times should also serve to allow us to better address and/or perceive the very nature of divinity – in entirely new or different sorts of ways. The many advancements coming from such rapid progress as we’ve made of late should not, in my mind, be something exclusively exploited by invention, technologies or whatever else, but might instead easily promise to open up brand new ground in areas that have each proven impossibly mysterious or all but unknowable to our long ago ancestors in the distant past.